Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1481 to 1500 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reimbursement of advertisement and promotion on a cost-to-cost basis was held allowable where the sister concern had already deducted tax on the underlying expenditure and no mark-up or lack of genuineness was shown; section 40(a)(ia) disallowance was deleted. Retainership fee under the joint venture arrangement was accepted as business expenditure, but for AY 2005-06 only proportionate accrual from the implementation date was allowed, with full claims upheld for later years. Reimbursement of joint venture operating expenses, business promotion expenditure, and fuel and telephone costs were also allowed, while short deduction of TDS did not attract section 40(a)(ia). Section 14A disallowance was sustained on a reasonable estimate.
Reimbursement of advertisement and promotion on a cost-to-cost basis was held allowable where the sister concern had already deducted tax on the underlying expenditure and no mark-up or lack of genuineness was shown; section 40(a)(ia) disallowance was deleted. Retainership fee under the joint venture arrangement was accepted as business expenditure, but for AY 2005-06 only proportionate accrual from the implementation date was allowed, with full claims upheld for later years. Reimbursement of joint venture operating expenses, business promotion expenditure, and fuel and telephone costs were also allowed, while short deduction of TDS did not attract section 40(a)(ia). Section 14A disallowance was sustained on a reasonable estimate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.