Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reimbursement of advertisement and promotion on a cost-to-cost basis was held allowable where the sister concern had already deducted tax on the underlying expenditure and no mark-up or lack of genuineness was shown; section 40(a)(ia) disallowance was deleted. Retainership fee under the joint venture arrangement was accepted as business expenditure, but for AY 2005-06 only proportionate accrual from the implementation date was allowed, with full claims upheld for later years. Reimbursement of joint venture operating expenses, business promotion expenditure, and fuel and telephone costs were also allowed, while short deduction of TDS did not attract section 40(a)(ia). Section 14A disallowance was sustained on a reasonable estimate.
Reimbursement of advertisement and promotion on a cost-to-cost basis was held allowable where the sister concern had already deducted tax on the underlying expenditure and no mark-up or lack of genuineness was shown; section 40(a)(ia) disallowance was deleted. Retainership fee under the joint venture arrangement was accepted as business expenditure, but for AY 2005-06 only proportionate accrual from the implementation date was allowed, with full claims upheld for later years. Reimbursement of joint venture operating expenses, business promotion expenditure, and fuel and telephone costs were also allowed, while short deduction of TDS did not attract section 40(a)(ia). Section 14A disallowance was sustained on a reasonable estimate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.