Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Receipts claimed as advances for sale of land were taxed as income from other sources because the assessee could not establish ownership, possession, or any surviving contingent right in the land, and the factual basis for treating the sums as capital receipts failed. The Tribunal held that, absent any proved property right or transfer, the amounts were taxable in the hands of the assessee. It also sustained reopening under section 147 for A.Y. 2009-10, holding that an error in the recorded quantum of receipt did not undermine the underlying reason to believe, since the MOU, the deal value, and the receipt itself remained undisputed.
Receipts claimed as advances for sale of land were taxed as income from other sources because the assessee could not establish ownership, possession, or any surviving contingent right in the land, and the factual basis for treating the sums as capital receipts failed. The Tribunal held that, absent any proved property right or transfer, the amounts were taxable in the hands of the assessee. It also sustained reopening under section 147 for A.Y. 2009-10, holding that an error in the recorded quantum of receipt did not undermine the underlying reason to believe, since the MOU, the deal value, and the receipt itself remained undisputed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
