Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Rule 86A(3) limits blocking of the Electronic Credit Ledger to one year from the date of imposition, and any continuance beyond that period is contrary to the rule. Where the ledger blocking had continued after expiry of twelve months, the restriction was treated as having automatically ceased to operate. The Court declared the continued blocking illegal and directed the authorities to unblock the Electronic Credit Ledger forthwith.
Rule 86A(3) limits blocking of the Electronic Credit Ledger to one year from the date of imposition, and any continuance beyond that period is contrary to the rule. Where the ledger blocking had continued after expiry of twelve months, the restriction was treated as having automatically ceased to operate. The Court declared the continued blocking illegal and directed the authorities to unblock the Electronic Credit Ledger forthwith.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.