Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Rule 86A(3) limits blocking of the Electronic Credit Ledger to one year from the date of imposition, and any continuance beyond that period is contrary to the rule. Where the ledger blocking had continued after expiry of twelve months, the restriction was treated as having automatically ceased to operate. The Court declared the continued blocking illegal and directed the authorities to unblock the Electronic Credit Ledger forthwith.
Rule 86A(3) limits blocking of the Electronic Credit Ledger to one year from the date of imposition, and any continuance beyond that period is contrary to the rule. Where the ledger blocking had continued after expiry of twelve months, the restriction was treated as having automatically ceased to operate. The Court declared the continued blocking illegal and directed the authorities to unblock the Electronic Credit Ledger forthwith.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.