Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
After a search under section 132 in the assessee's case, the ITAT held that the Assessing Officer could not continue with a normal scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) and had to proceed under the special post-search statutory route. Because the Revenue did not dislodge this jurisdictional defect, the Tribunal found an invalid assumption of jurisdiction and quashed the assessment framed under section 143(3). The grounds challenging the additions on merits were therefore rendered academic.
After a search under section 132 in the assessee's case, the ITAT held that the Assessing Officer could not continue with a normal scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) and had to proceed under the special post-search statutory route. Because the Revenue did not dislodge this jurisdictional defect, the Tribunal found an invalid assumption of jurisdiction and quashed the assessment framed under section 143(3). The grounds challenging the additions on merits were therefore rendered academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
