Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Penalty under section 270A could not be adjudicated because the quantum addition forming its basis had already been restored for fresh consideration under the applicable double taxation avoidance agreement. With the underlying addition no longer final, the penalty appeal was premature. The matter was therefore sent back for fresh decision by the Assessing Officer, who was directed to consider whether penalty proceedings should be initiated only after the outcome of the quantum proceedings.
Penalty under section 270A could not be adjudicated because the quantum addition forming its basis had already been restored for fresh consideration under the applicable double taxation avoidance agreement. With the underlying addition no longer final, the penalty appeal was premature. The matter was therefore sent back for fresh decision by the Assessing Officer, who was directed to consider whether penalty proceedings should be initiated only after the outcome of the quantum proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
