Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
In real estate insolvency, where the Section 7 applicants were allottees of one project and the alleged default related only to that project, the NCLAT held that the CIRP should proceed on a project-specific basis. The admission order was modified to confine the insolvency process to Krishna Housing Scheme, since extending it to other projects would prejudice separate homebuyers and stakeholders. The Tribunal further held that claims in the CIRP must also be limited to that project, while the IRP/RP may process claims under the CIRP Regulations and need not adjudicate individual creditor disputes at this stage. Creditors and financial institutions linked to other projects were left free to pursue independent remedies.
In real estate insolvency, where the Section 7 applicants were allottees of one project and the alleged default related only to that project, the NCLAT held that the CIRP should proceed on a project-specific basis. The admission order was modified to confine the insolvency process to Krishna Housing Scheme, since extending it to other projects would prejudice separate homebuyers and stakeholders. The Tribunal further held that claims in the CIRP must also be limited to that project, while the IRP/RP may process claims under the CIRP Regulations and need not adjudicate individual creditor disputes at this stage. Creditors and financial institutions linked to other projects were left free to pursue independent remedies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
