Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
In real estate insolvency, where the Section 7 applicants were allottees of one project and the alleged default related only to that project, the NCLAT held that the CIRP should proceed on a project-specific basis. The admission order was modified to confine the insolvency process to Krishna Housing Scheme, since extending it to other projects would prejudice separate homebuyers and stakeholders. The Tribunal further held that claims in the CIRP must also be limited to that project, while the IRP/RP may process claims under the CIRP Regulations and need not adjudicate individual creditor disputes at this stage. Creditors and financial institutions linked to other projects were left free to pursue independent remedies.
In real estate insolvency, where the Section 7 applicants were allottees of one project and the alleged default related only to that project, the NCLAT held that the CIRP should proceed on a project-specific basis. The admission order was modified to confine the insolvency process to Krishna Housing Scheme, since extending it to other projects would prejudice separate homebuyers and stakeholders. The Tribunal further held that claims in the CIRP must also be limited to that project, while the IRP/RP may process claims under the CIRP Regulations and need not adjudicate individual creditor disputes at this stage. Creditors and financial institutions linked to other projects were left free to pursue independent remedies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
