Faceless assessment notice must cover specific prejudicial variations; unexplained final additions without notice breach section 144B and natural just...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4021 to 4040 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In real estate insolvency, where the Section 7 applicants were allottees of one project and the alleged default related only to that project, the NCLAT held that the CIRP should proceed on a project-specific basis. The admission order was modified to confine the insolvency process to Krishna Housing Scheme, since extending it to other projects would prejudice separate homebuyers and stakeholders. The Tribunal further held that claims in the CIRP must also be limited to that project, while the IRP/RP may process claims under the CIRP Regulations and need not adjudicate individual creditor disputes at this stage. Creditors and financial institutions linked to other projects were left free to pursue independent remedies.
In real estate insolvency, where the Section 7 applicants were allottees of one project and the alleged default related only to that project, the NCLAT held that the CIRP should proceed on a project-specific basis. The admission order was modified to confine the insolvency process to Krishna Housing Scheme, since extending it to other projects would prejudice separate homebuyers and stakeholders. The Tribunal further held that claims in the CIRP must also be limited to that project, while the IRP/RP may process claims under the CIRP Regulations and need not adjudicate individual creditor disputes at this stage. Creditors and financial institutions linked to other projects were left free to pursue independent remedies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
