Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The ITAT held that the proviso to section 2(15) applies only when an advancing general public utility carries on trade, commerce or business activity, to be assessed on the overall factual matrix by the dominant purpose test. Here, the Assessing Officer relied mainly on the nature and quantum of receipts without examining the trust objects or application of income. Rental income from property held under trust and interest from permitted investments was treated as incidental, not independent business income. As the activities were genuine, in furtherance of trust objects, and most income was applied to those objects, the proviso was not attracted and exemption under section 11 was allowed; consequential additions and disallowances were deleted.
The ITAT held that the proviso to section 2(15) applies only when an advancing general public utility carries on trade, commerce or business activity, to be assessed on the overall factual matrix by the dominant purpose test. Here, the Assessing Officer relied mainly on the nature and quantum of receipts without examining the trust objects or application of income. Rental income from property held under trust and interest from permitted investments was treated as incidental, not independent business income. As the activities were genuine, in furtherance of trust objects, and most income was applied to those objects, the proviso was not attracted and exemption under section 11 was allowed; consequential additions and disallowances were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
