Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5741 to 5760 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that a revision under section 263 could not be exercised where the assessment order had been passed in conformity with directions of the DRP, a superior collegial authority. Once the AO gives effect to binding DRP directions and frames the final order accordingly, the Commissioner lacks revisional jurisdiction over that order. On that basis, the section 263 order was quashed for want of jurisdiction, and the remaining grounds were treated as infructuous.
ITAT held that a revision under section 263 could not be exercised where the assessment order had been passed in conformity with directions of the DRP, a superior collegial authority. Once the AO gives effect to binding DRP directions and frames the final order accordingly, the Commissioner lacks revisional jurisdiction over that order. On that basis, the section 263 order was quashed for want of jurisdiction, and the remaining grounds were treated as infructuous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
