Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
ITAT held that a revision under section 263 could not be exercised where the assessment order had been passed in conformity with directions of the DRP, a superior collegial authority. Once the AO gives effect to binding DRP directions and frames the final order accordingly, the Commissioner lacks revisional jurisdiction over that order. On that basis, the section 263 order was quashed for want of jurisdiction, and the remaining grounds were treated as infructuous.
ITAT held that a revision under section 263 could not be exercised where the assessment order had been passed in conformity with directions of the DRP, a superior collegial authority. Once the AO gives effect to binding DRP directions and frames the final order accordingly, the Commissioner lacks revisional jurisdiction over that order. On that basis, the section 263 order was quashed for want of jurisdiction, and the remaining grounds were treated as infructuous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
