Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
ITAT held that a revision under section 263 could not be exercised where the assessment order had been passed in conformity with directions of the DRP, a superior collegial authority. Once the AO gives effect to binding DRP directions and frames the final order accordingly, the Commissioner lacks revisional jurisdiction over that order. On that basis, the section 263 order was quashed for want of jurisdiction, and the remaining grounds were treated as infructuous.
ITAT held that a revision under section 263 could not be exercised where the assessment order had been passed in conformity with directions of the DRP, a superior collegial authority. Once the AO gives effect to binding DRP directions and frames the final order accordingly, the Commissioner lacks revisional jurisdiction over that order. On that basis, the section 263 order was quashed for want of jurisdiction, and the remaining grounds were treated as infructuous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
