Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Unsigned approval under section 151 for reassessment was treated as invalid because section 282A(1) requires electronic tax documents to be signed. Following its earlier rulings, the ITAT held that this signature requirement is mandatory; where the approval bore no signature, it was void ab initio. As the foundational approval itself was unlawful, the reassessment proceedings based on it could not survive and the assessment was unsustainable.
Unsigned approval under section 151 for reassessment was treated as invalid because section 282A(1) requires electronic tax documents to be signed. Following its earlier rulings, the ITAT held that this signature requirement is mandatory; where the approval bore no signature, it was void ab initio. As the foundational approval itself was unlawful, the reassessment proceedings based on it could not survive and the assessment was unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.