Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Unsigned approval under section 151 for reassessment was treated as invalid because section 282A(1) requires electronic tax documents to be signed. Following its earlier rulings, the ITAT held that this signature requirement is mandatory; where the approval bore no signature, it was void ab initio. As the foundational approval itself was unlawful, the reassessment proceedings based on it could not survive and the assessment was unsustainable.
Unsigned approval under section 151 for reassessment was treated as invalid because section 282A(1) requires electronic tax documents to be signed. Following its earlier rulings, the ITAT held that this signature requirement is mandatory; where the approval bore no signature, it was void ab initio. As the foundational approval itself was unlawful, the reassessment proceedings based on it could not survive and the assessment was unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.