Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5941 to 5960 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Unsigned approval under section 151 for reassessment was treated as invalid because section 282A(1) requires electronic tax documents to be signed. Following its earlier rulings, the ITAT held that this signature requirement is mandatory; where the approval bore no signature, it was void ab initio. As the foundational approval itself was unlawful, the reassessment proceedings based on it could not survive and the assessment was unsustainable.
Unsigned approval under section 151 for reassessment was treated as invalid because section 282A(1) requires electronic tax documents to be signed. Following its earlier rulings, the ITAT held that this signature requirement is mandatory; where the approval bore no signature, it was void ab initio. As the foundational approval itself was unlawful, the reassessment proceedings based on it could not survive and the assessment was unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.