Faceless assessment notice must cover specific prejudicial variations; unexplained final additions without notice breach section 144B and natural just...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4021 to 4040 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Re-export of seized imported goods was permitted pending adjudication because the Court declined to examine alleged misclassification or misdeclaration and proceeded on the undisputed position that the goods had remained in custody for a prolonged period, samples had already been drawn, and continued seizure would serve no useful purpose. The permission was made conditional on the petitioner executing a bond for the differential duty payable and furnishing a bank guarantee equivalent to 5% of the re-determined value. The writ petition was disposed of on that basis, with the respondents directed to allow re-export subject to those safeguards.
Re-export of seized imported goods was permitted pending adjudication because the Court declined to examine alleged misclassification or misdeclaration and proceeded on the undisputed position that the goods had remained in custody for a prolonged period, samples had already been drawn, and continued seizure would serve no useful purpose. The permission was made conditional on the petitioner executing a bond for the differential duty payable and furnishing a bank guarantee equivalent to 5% of the re-determined value. The writ petition was disposed of on that basis, with the respondents directed to allow re-export subject to those safeguards.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
