Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1481 to 1500 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The NCLAT upheld approval of the resolution plan, applying limited judicial review and the CoC's commercial wisdom because no breach of Section 30(2) or material procedural irregularity was shown. Objections on CIRP costs failed since the plan treated unpaid costs as payable at actuals and, in any event, the issue had become academic after implementation. The EPF treatment was sustained because the plan set aside funds from secured creditors' share for a contingent statutory liability, causing no prejudice to the dissenting creditor. The extension of the e-voting window, clarificatory communications, and rejection of a Swiss Challenge were also held permissible, and the appeals were dismissed.
The NCLAT upheld approval of the resolution plan, applying limited judicial review and the CoC's commercial wisdom because no breach of Section 30(2) or material procedural irregularity was shown. Objections on CIRP costs failed since the plan treated unpaid costs as payable at actuals and, in any event, the issue had become academic after implementation. The EPF treatment was sustained because the plan set aside funds from secured creditors' share for a contingent statutory liability, causing no prejudice to the dissenting creditor. The extension of the e-voting window, clarificatory communications, and rejection of a Swiss Challenge were also held permissible, and the appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
