Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
A Section 9 insolvency application may fail where the corporate debtor shows a real and plausible pre-existing dispute that existed before the demand notice; the dispute can be raised even in the reply to the application if it predates the notice. Applying the Mobilox test, the tribunal found subsisting disputes on liability through earlier notices and settlement arrangements, and upheld rejection of CIRP initiation. On the contract, the alleged service fee was treated only as a profit share after deduction of usage fees and expenses, not an independent operational debt. The termination terms and unsupported balance emails did not establish debt due from the corporate debtor.
A Section 9 insolvency application may fail where the corporate debtor shows a real and plausible pre-existing dispute that existed before the demand notice; the dispute can be raised even in the reply to the application if it predates the notice. Applying the Mobilox test, the tribunal found subsisting disputes on liability through earlier notices and settlement arrangements, and upheld rejection of CIRP initiation. On the contract, the alleged service fee was treated only as a profit share after deduction of usage fees and expenses, not an independent operational debt. The termination terms and unsupported balance emails did not establish debt due from the corporate debtor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
