Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    GST portal migration from QRMP to monthly returns permitted, with backend changes and late-fee compliance required.
    Writ interference at show cause stage refused where GST notice raised disputed factual and classification issues.
    Composite supply in CIF imports bars separate GST on ocean freight; double taxation on the service element is impermissible.
    Belated GST appeal may be entertained on condition of pre-deposit where reduced-penalty relief was not used.
    Electronic credit ledger blocking cannot survive beyond one year and ordinarily requires a pre-decisional hearing.
    Retrospective GST amendment cured belated input tax credit defect, leading to quashing of the demand and fresh adjudication.
    Blocked input tax credit on land lease rental for factory construction extends to pre- and post-construction periods.
    Accrued liability and sale-and-lease-back principles upheld: construction deduction and film depreciation sustained against Revenue challenge.
    Stayed tax demand cannot be set off against refund; High Court orders release of refund with statutory interest.
    Section 10A turnover parity and subsidiary investment nexus resolved in part, with one issue remitted for fresh scrutiny.
    Section 10A parity, goodwill depreciation, and business nexus of subsidiary advances shaped the tax dispute outcomes.
    Functional comparability in transfer pricing failed for MPS Ltd.; exclusion from comparables removed the adjustment.
    Under-reporting penalty under section 270A deleted after quantum addition failed and returned income was accepted.
    Section 54F relief upheld for investment before section 139(4), single contiguous house ownership, and asset-wise capital gains treatment.
    Composite property and stamp valuation disputes: residential portion qualifies for section 54, and DVO reference is required.
    Unabated assessments need year-specific incriminating material; loose notings and mere presumption cannot sustain property-sale additions.
    Compensatory interest and business advances upheld as allowable; cash payment and unexplained credit additions were rejected.
    ITBA upload of DRP directions starts limitation for final assessment; delayed orders are time-barred and quashed.
    Transfer pricing comparability adjustments turned on foreign exchange, customs duty, liability write-back and cash PLI methodology.
    Transfer pricing characterization and FAR analysis required fresh review before selecting the most appropriate method.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      A Section 9 insolvency application may fail where the corporate...

      Pre-existing dispute and no operational debt defeat Section 9 insolvency application under a profit-sharing contract

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      IBCApril 15, 2026Case LawsAT
      A Section 9 insolvency application may fail where the corporate debtor shows a real and plausible pre-existing dispute that existed before the demand notice; the dispute can be raised even in the reply to the application if it predates the notice. Applying the Mobilox test, the tribunal found subsisting disputes on liability through earlier notices and settlement arrangements, and upheld rejection of CIRP initiation. On the contract, the alleged service fee was treated only as a profit share after deduction of usage fees and expenses, not an independent operational debt. The termination terms and unsupported balance emails did not establish debt due from the corporate debtor.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax