Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Provisional attachment under money laundering law was sustained where the Tribunal held that the attachment was confined to the accused co-owner's share and did not extend to the non-accused spouse's interest. It further held that property of equivalent value could be attached when the alleged proceeds of crime had been dissipated or were no longer available, and that prior purchase or disclosed source of funds did not defeat such attachment on the facts. The confirmation of the provisional attachment order was therefore upheld and the appeals were dismissed.
Provisional attachment under money laundering law was sustained where the Tribunal held that the attachment was confined to the accused co-owner's share and did not extend to the non-accused spouse's interest. It further held that property of equivalent value could be attached when the alleged proceeds of crime had been dissipated or were no longer available, and that prior purchase or disclosed source of funds did not defeat such attachment on the facts. The confirmation of the provisional attachment order was therefore upheld and the appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
