Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Deduction under Chapter VIA for new employment could not be denied merely because Form No. 10DA was filed belatedly. The Tribunal treated the form-filing requirement as procedural, not substantive, and followed its earlier view that delay in furnishing the form does not defeat an otherwise admissible claim where no contrary material is shown. As the facts and grounds were identical for both assessment years, the same relief applied in each year. The appellate order was set aside and the Assessing Officer/CPC was directed to allow the deduction as claimed.
Deduction under Chapter VIA for new employment could not be denied merely because Form No. 10DA was filed belatedly. The Tribunal treated the form-filing requirement as procedural, not substantive, and followed its earlier view that delay in furnishing the form does not defeat an otherwise admissible claim where no contrary material is shown. As the facts and grounds were identical for both assessment years, the same relief applied in each year. The appellate order was set aside and the Assessing Officer/CPC was directed to allow the deduction as claimed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
