Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Deduction under Chapter VIA for new employment could not be denied merely because Form No. 10DA was filed belatedly. The Tribunal treated the form-filing requirement as procedural, not substantive, and followed its earlier view that delay in furnishing the form does not defeat an otherwise admissible claim where no contrary material is shown. As the facts and grounds were identical for both assessment years, the same relief applied in each year. The appellate order was set aside and the Assessing Officer/CPC was directed to allow the deduction as claimed.
Deduction under Chapter VIA for new employment could not be denied merely because Form No. 10DA was filed belatedly. The Tribunal treated the form-filing requirement as procedural, not substantive, and followed its earlier view that delay in furnishing the form does not defeat an otherwise admissible claim where no contrary material is shown. As the facts and grounds were identical for both assessment years, the same relief applied in each year. The appellate order was set aside and the Assessing Officer/CPC was directed to allow the deduction as claimed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.