Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Deduction under Chapter VIA for new employment could not be denied merely because Form No. 10DA was filed belatedly. The Tribunal treated the form-filing requirement as procedural, not substantive, and followed its earlier view that delay in furnishing the form does not defeat an otherwise admissible claim where no contrary material is shown. As the facts and grounds were identical for both assessment years, the same relief applied in each year. The appellate order was set aside and the Assessing Officer/CPC was directed to allow the deduction as claimed.
Deduction under Chapter VIA for new employment could not be denied merely because Form No. 10DA was filed belatedly. The Tribunal treated the form-filing requirement as procedural, not substantive, and followed its earlier view that delay in furnishing the form does not defeat an otherwise admissible claim where no contrary material is shown. As the facts and grounds were identical for both assessment years, the same relief applied in each year. The appellate order was set aside and the Assessing Officer/CPC was directed to allow the deduction as claimed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.