Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Exemption under section 11 was sustained because the assessee's letting of an auditorium was held to be merely incidental to its dominant charitable objects of education and medical relief, undertaken to augment funds. The Tribunal followed its decision in the assessee's own earlier year on identical facts and found that the activity did not amount to carrying on business, so the proviso to section 2(15) was not attracted. The Commissioner (Appeals)'s grant of relief under section 11 therefore required no interference, and the exemption was upheld for both assessment years.
Exemption under section 11 was sustained because the assessee's letting of an auditorium was held to be merely incidental to its dominant charitable objects of education and medical relief, undertaken to augment funds. The Tribunal followed its decision in the assessee's own earlier year on identical facts and found that the activity did not amount to carrying on business, so the proviso to section 2(15) was not attracted. The Commissioner (Appeals)'s grant of relief under section 11 therefore required no interference, and the exemption was upheld for both assessment years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
