Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1481 to 1500 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An assessment or transfer pricing order passed in the name of a dissolved amalgamating company is void ab initio when the successor entity had already informed the tax authorities of the amalgamation and furnished the NCLT-approved scheme. Applying Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., the ITAT held that such an error is not a curable procedural defect under section 292B. The transfer pricing order, draft assessment order and final assessment order, all issued after dissolution in the name and PAN of the non-existent company, were therefore bad in law.
An assessment or transfer pricing order passed in the name of a dissolved amalgamating company is void ab initio when the successor entity had already informed the tax authorities of the amalgamation and furnished the NCLT-approved scheme. Applying Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., the ITAT held that such an error is not a curable procedural defect under section 292B. The transfer pricing order, draft assessment order and final assessment order, all issued after dissolution in the name and PAN of the non-existent company, were therefore bad in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.