Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
An assessment or transfer pricing order passed in the name of a dissolved amalgamating company is void ab initio when the successor entity had already informed the tax authorities of the amalgamation and furnished the NCLT-approved scheme. Applying Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., the ITAT held that such an error is not a curable procedural defect under section 292B. The transfer pricing order, draft assessment order and final assessment order, all issued after dissolution in the name and PAN of the non-existent company, were therefore bad in law.
An assessment or transfer pricing order passed in the name of a dissolved amalgamating company is void ab initio when the successor entity had already informed the tax authorities of the amalgamation and furnished the NCLT-approved scheme. Applying Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., the ITAT held that such an error is not a curable procedural defect under section 292B. The transfer pricing order, draft assessment order and final assessment order, all issued after dissolution in the name and PAN of the non-existent company, were therefore bad in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.