Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
An assessment or transfer pricing order passed in the name of a dissolved amalgamating company is void ab initio when the successor entity had already informed the tax authorities of the amalgamation and furnished the NCLT-approved scheme. Applying Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., the ITAT held that such an error is not a curable procedural defect under section 292B. The transfer pricing order, draft assessment order and final assessment order, all issued after dissolution in the name and PAN of the non-existent company, were therefore bad in law.
An assessment or transfer pricing order passed in the name of a dissolved amalgamating company is void ab initio when the successor entity had already informed the tax authorities of the amalgamation and furnished the NCLT-approved scheme. Applying Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., the ITAT held that such an error is not a curable procedural defect under section 292B. The transfer pricing order, draft assessment order and final assessment order, all issued after dissolution in the name and PAN of the non-existent company, were therefore bad in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
