CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars was upheld where commission expenditure was found non-genuine, as third-party verification showed the alleged intermediaries had not rendered services and the assessee failed to substantiate the claim. Where penalty had been computed on additions not finally sustained in appeal, it was treated as a mistake apparent from the record and was directed to be recomputed only on the surviving addition. Penalty under section 41(1) for waiver of interest liability was deleted for one year because the assessee's explanation based on a bona fide one-time settlement with banks was accepted, and penalty was not automatic merely because the addition survived.
Penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars was upheld where commission expenditure was found non-genuine, as third-party verification showed the alleged intermediaries had not rendered services and the assessee failed to substantiate the claim. Where penalty had been computed on additions not finally sustained in appeal, it was treated as a mistake apparent from the record and was directed to be recomputed only on the surviving addition. Penalty under section 41(1) for waiver of interest liability was deleted for one year because the assessee's explanation based on a bona fide one-time settlement with banks was accepted, and penalty was not automatic merely because the addition survived.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.