Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
An appellate authority cannot grant relief on the basis of fresh evidence without following Rule 46A(3), including seeking a remand report from the AO. Here, the assessee's claim that the provision for expenses matched invoices received in the next year was not supported by the material on record before the AO, and complete expenditure details were also missing. The ITAT therefore set aside the deletion of the disallowance and restored the matter to the jurisdictional AO for fresh verification of the provision, the subsequent invoices, and the supporting evidence after giving the assessee an opportunity to produce complete details.
An appellate authority cannot grant relief on the basis of fresh evidence without following Rule 46A(3), including seeking a remand report from the AO. Here, the assessee's claim that the provision for expenses matched invoices received in the next year was not supported by the material on record before the AO, and complete expenditure details were also missing. The ITAT therefore set aside the deletion of the disallowance and restored the matter to the jurisdictional AO for fresh verification of the provision, the subsequent invoices, and the supporting evidence after giving the assessee an opportunity to produce complete details.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.