Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1361 to 1380 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An appellate authority cannot grant relief on the basis of fresh evidence without following Rule 46A(3), including seeking a remand report from the AO. Here, the assessee's claim that the provision for expenses matched invoices received in the next year was not supported by the material on record before the AO, and complete expenditure details were also missing. The ITAT therefore set aside the deletion of the disallowance and restored the matter to the jurisdictional AO for fresh verification of the provision, the subsequent invoices, and the supporting evidence after giving the assessee an opportunity to produce complete details.
An appellate authority cannot grant relief on the basis of fresh evidence without following Rule 46A(3), including seeking a remand report from the AO. Here, the assessee's claim that the provision for expenses matched invoices received in the next year was not supported by the material on record before the AO, and complete expenditure details were also missing. The ITAT therefore set aside the deletion of the disallowance and restored the matter to the jurisdictional AO for fresh verification of the provision, the subsequent invoices, and the supporting evidence after giving the assessee an opportunity to produce complete details.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.