Mis-declaration and Concealment: confiscation affirmed, transaction value re-determined and mandatory penalty sustained; redemption allowed on payment...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5561 to 5580 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An appellate authority cannot grant relief on the basis of fresh evidence without following Rule 46A(3), including seeking a remand report from the AO. Here, the assessee's claim that the provision for expenses matched invoices received in the next year was not supported by the material on record before the AO, and complete expenditure details were also missing. The ITAT therefore set aside the deletion of the disallowance and restored the matter to the jurisdictional AO for fresh verification of the provision, the subsequent invoices, and the supporting evidence after giving the assessee an opportunity to produce complete details.
An appellate authority cannot grant relief on the basis of fresh evidence without following Rule 46A(3), including seeking a remand report from the AO. Here, the assessee's claim that the provision for expenses matched invoices received in the next year was not supported by the material on record before the AO, and complete expenditure details were also missing. The ITAT therefore set aside the deletion of the disallowance and restored the matter to the jurisdictional AO for fresh verification of the provision, the subsequent invoices, and the supporting evidence after giving the assessee an opportunity to produce complete details.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
