Content ownership determines GST treatment of printed publications: customer-supplied text is a taxable printing service, owned content is exempt good...
Employee recoveries, input tax credit and notice pay recovery under GST: AAR distinguishes taxable supplies from non-taxable perquisites and penalties...
An appellate authority cannot grant relief on the basis of fresh evidence without following Rule 46A(3), including seeking a remand report from the AO. Here, the assessee's claim that the provision for expenses matched invoices received in the next year was not supported by the material on record before the AO, and complete expenditure details were also missing. The ITAT therefore set aside the deletion of the disallowance and restored the matter to the jurisdictional AO for fresh verification of the provision, the subsequent invoices, and the supporting evidence after giving the assessee an opportunity to produce complete details.
An appellate authority cannot grant relief on the basis of fresh evidence without following Rule 46A(3), including seeking a remand report from the AO. Here, the assessee's claim that the provision for expenses matched invoices received in the next year was not supported by the material on record before the AO, and complete expenditure details were also missing. The ITAT therefore set aside the deletion of the disallowance and restored the matter to the jurisdictional AO for fresh verification of the provision, the subsequent invoices, and the supporting evidence after giving the assessee an opportunity to produce complete details.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.