Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Admission of a Section 7 insolvency application may be deferred only where relevant facts justify restraint, including the amount awarded, the wider debt position, and the corporate debtor's financial health and viability. Applying Vidarbha Industries Power Ltd., the Appellate Tribunal noted that the debt extended to consortium lenders, the execution claim was far below the admitted consortium debt, and the corporate debtor was only a project SPV with no independent business or income and no financial viability after takeover of the project. On those facts, the arbitral award in favour of the corporate debtor did not justify refusal or deferral of CIRP admission, and the Section 7 admission was upheld.
Admission of a Section 7 insolvency application may be deferred only where relevant facts justify restraint, including the amount awarded, the wider debt position, and the corporate debtor's financial health and viability. Applying Vidarbha Industries Power Ltd., the Appellate Tribunal noted that the debt extended to consortium lenders, the execution claim was far below the admitted consortium debt, and the corporate debtor was only a project SPV with no independent business or income and no financial viability after takeover of the project. On those facts, the arbitral award in favour of the corporate debtor did not justify refusal or deferral of CIRP admission, and the Section 7 admission was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.