Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6761 to 6780 of 96408 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Third-party search material and uncorroborated seized papers...
Rebuttable search presumptions and corroboration standards shaped deletion of unsubstantiated additions, while rental income and limited profit estimates were sustained.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Third-party search material and uncorroborated seized papers could not sustain on-money or unaccounted purchase additions where the documents lacked a clear nexus to the assessees and the presumptions under sections 132(4A) and 292C remained rebuttable; those additions were deleted. An unsigned, unregistered agreement to sell and contradictory valuation reports were likewise insufficient to support protective and substantive property additions. By contrast, undisclosed rental income admitted in search was sustained in the absence of any evidence that it belonged to an HUF. Stock shortages supported a limited gross profit addition, and for unaccounted sales in the liquor business the profit element was restricted to 3%, with separate additions for alleged purchases deleted.
Third-party search material and uncorroborated seized papers could not sustain on-money or unaccounted purchase additions where the documents lacked a clear nexus to the assessees and the presumptions under sections 132(4A) and 292C remained rebuttable; those additions were deleted. An unsigned, unregistered agreement to sell and contradictory valuation reports were likewise insufficient to support protective and substantive property additions. By contrast, undisclosed rental income admitted in search was sustained in the absence of any evidence that it belonged to an HUF. Stock shortages supported a limited gross profit addition, and for unaccounted sales in the liquor business the profit element was restricted to 3%, with separate additions for alleged purchases deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
