Provisional attachment under Prevention of Money Laundering Act requires exhaustion of statutory remedies; impugned order set aside, appeal to tribuna...
Restoration of property under Prevention of Money Laundering Act after attachment dispute rendered academic; possession directed to successful resolut...
Goods Transport Agency services via e commerce portals: consignment note creates custody and liability and enables exemption for unregistered recipien...
Reverse charge and assignment of royalty collection: exemption for excess royalty collectors subject to reconciliation; leaseholders remain liable und...
Third-party search material and uncorroborated seized papers...
Rebuttable search presumptions and corroboration standards shaped deletion of unsubstantiated additions, while rental income and limited profit estimates were sustained.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Third-party search material and uncorroborated seized papers could not sustain on-money or unaccounted purchase additions where the documents lacked a clear nexus to the assessees and the presumptions under sections 132(4A) and 292C remained rebuttable; those additions were deleted. An unsigned, unregistered agreement to sell and contradictory valuation reports were likewise insufficient to support protective and substantive property additions. By contrast, undisclosed rental income admitted in search was sustained in the absence of any evidence that it belonged to an HUF. Stock shortages supported a limited gross profit addition, and for unaccounted sales in the liquor business the profit element was restricted to 3%, with separate additions for alleged purchases deleted.
Third-party search material and uncorroborated seized papers could not sustain on-money or unaccounted purchase additions where the documents lacked a clear nexus to the assessees and the presumptions under sections 132(4A) and 292C remained rebuttable; those additions were deleted. An unsigned, unregistered agreement to sell and contradictory valuation reports were likewise insufficient to support protective and substantive property additions. By contrast, undisclosed rental income admitted in search was sustained in the absence of any evidence that it belonged to an HUF. Stock shortages supported a limited gross profit addition, and for unaccounted sales in the liquor business the profit element was restricted to 3%, with separate additions for alleged purchases deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
