Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Gas compressors manufactured solely for use in motor-vehicle air-conditioning units were classified under Heading 8708 as parts and accessories of motor vehicles, not under Heading 8414, because goods meant only for vehicles in Chapter 87 are treated as vehicle parts and the more specific vehicle-heading prevailed. The classification under Heading 8708 was upheld. However, wilful suppression or fraud was not established where the taxpayer had consistently adopted the earlier accepted classification on a bona fide basis, so invocation of Section 74 and the associated penalty were set aside. The matter was remanded only for requantification of tax and fresh determination under Section 73.
Gas compressors manufactured solely for use in motor-vehicle air-conditioning units were classified under Heading 8708 as parts and accessories of motor vehicles, not under Heading 8414, because goods meant only for vehicles in Chapter 87 are treated as vehicle parts and the more specific vehicle-heading prevailed. The classification under Heading 8708 was upheld. However, wilful suppression or fraud was not established where the taxpayer had consistently adopted the earlier accepted classification on a bona fide basis, so invocation of Section 74 and the associated penalty were set aside. The matter was remanded only for requantification of tax and fresh determination under Section 73.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.