Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1221 to 1240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Personal shares of office-bearers could not be attached where the alleged proceeds of crime were received by an education society and no material showed personal receipt or direct or indirect benefit to the individuals. The Tribunal noted that the funds were, on the respondents' own case, used for servicing the society's loan or transferred onward, and mere status as President and Secretary was insufficient to establish the required nexus with the attached assets. As no part of the proceeds of crime was shown to have remained with the individuals or to have been routed for their benefit, the attachment of their shares was set aside.
Personal shares of office-bearers could not be attached where the alleged proceeds of crime were received by an education society and no material showed personal receipt or direct or indirect benefit to the individuals. The Tribunal noted that the funds were, on the respondents' own case, used for servicing the society's loan or transferred onward, and mere status as President and Secretary was insufficient to establish the required nexus with the attached assets. As no part of the proceeds of crime was shown to have remained with the individuals or to have been routed for their benefit, the attachment of their shares was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.