Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Personal shares of office-bearers could not be attached where the alleged proceeds of crime were received by an education society and no material showed personal receipt or direct or indirect benefit to the individuals. The Tribunal noted that the funds were, on the respondents' own case, used for servicing the society's loan or transferred onward, and mere status as President and Secretary was insufficient to establish the required nexus with the attached assets. As no part of the proceeds of crime was shown to have remained with the individuals or to have been routed for their benefit, the attachment of their shares was set aside.
Personal shares of office-bearers could not be attached where the alleged proceeds of crime were received by an education society and no material showed personal receipt or direct or indirect benefit to the individuals. The Tribunal noted that the funds were, on the respondents' own case, used for servicing the society's loan or transferred onward, and mere status as President and Secretary was insufficient to establish the required nexus with the attached assets. As no part of the proceeds of crime was shown to have remained with the individuals or to have been routed for their benefit, the attachment of their shares was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.