Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Mandatory electronic upload of the summary of an adjudication order under GST is required to preserve the taxpayer's statutory right of appeal, and the appellate authority cannot treat an appeal as time-barred where that summary was issued later. Following its earlier view and the Supreme Court's principle in ASP Traders, the HC held that reliance only on an earlier email transmission was insufficient in the circumstances. The appellate order rejecting the appeal on limitation was quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal on merits without reference to limitation.
Mandatory electronic upload of the summary of an adjudication order under GST is required to preserve the taxpayer's statutory right of appeal, and the appellate authority cannot treat an appeal as time-barred where that summary was issued later. Following its earlier view and the Supreme Court's principle in ASP Traders, the HC held that reliance only on an earlier email transmission was insufficient in the circumstances. The appellate order rejecting the appeal on limitation was quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal on merits without reference to limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.