Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Approved resolution plans extinguish unsubmitted pre-approval tax claims, preventing later recovery outside the insolvency process and preserving a cl...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1341 to 1360 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Mandatory electronic upload of the summary of an adjudication order under GST is required to preserve the taxpayer's statutory right of appeal, and the appellate authority cannot treat an appeal as time-barred where that summary was issued later. Following its earlier view and the Supreme Court's principle in ASP Traders, the HC held that reliance only on an earlier email transmission was insufficient in the circumstances. The appellate order rejecting the appeal on limitation was quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal on merits without reference to limitation.
Mandatory electronic upload of the summary of an adjudication order under GST is required to preserve the taxpayer's statutory right of appeal, and the appellate authority cannot treat an appeal as time-barred where that summary was issued later. Following its earlier view and the Supreme Court's principle in ASP Traders, the HC held that reliance only on an earlier email transmission was insufficient in the circumstances. The appellate order rejecting the appeal on limitation was quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal on merits without reference to limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.