Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
HC held that reassessment based on an undated third-party complaint and other unverified material could not be sustained where there was no direct nexus with the assessee. The complaint was not authenticated, its author was not examined, and no further investigation linked the petitioner to any alleged cash transaction. The statements later recorded and the image of the cash receipt also failed to show any transaction by or with the petitioner. Reopening founded on conjectures and surmises was therefore unsustainable, and the reassessment notices and the order under section 148A(3) were quashed.
HC held that reassessment based on an undated third-party complaint and other unverified material could not be sustained where there was no direct nexus with the assessee. The complaint was not authenticated, its author was not examined, and no further investigation linked the petitioner to any alleged cash transaction. The statements later recorded and the image of the cash receipt also failed to show any transaction by or with the petitioner. Reopening founded on conjectures and surmises was therefore unsustainable, and the reassessment notices and the order under section 148A(3) were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
