CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Working capital adjustment in a transfer pricing giving-effect order required proper evidentiary substantiation. The Court noted that the earlier direction to reconsider the claim was not enough because the petitioner failed to comply with the later requisition for working capital details and their impact on profit, and had only furnished an Excel calculation of the adjusted margin. Mere calculations were insufficient; the claim had to be authenticated with supporting documents duly certified by a Chartered Accountant. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh consideration on merits, with liberty to upload the required particulars and an opportunity of hearing before a fresh order was passed.
Working capital adjustment in a transfer pricing giving-effect order required proper evidentiary substantiation. The Court noted that the earlier direction to reconsider the claim was not enough because the petitioner failed to comply with the later requisition for working capital details and their impact on profit, and had only furnished an Excel calculation of the adjusted margin. Mere calculations were insufficient; the claim had to be authenticated with supporting documents duly certified by a Chartered Accountant. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh consideration on merits, with liberty to upload the required particulars and an opportunity of hearing before a fresh order was passed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
