Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Working capital adjustment in a transfer pricing giving-effect order required proper evidentiary substantiation. The Court noted that the earlier direction to reconsider the claim was not enough because the petitioner failed to comply with the later requisition for working capital details and their impact on profit, and had only furnished an Excel calculation of the adjusted margin. Mere calculations were insufficient; the claim had to be authenticated with supporting documents duly certified by a Chartered Accountant. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh consideration on merits, with liberty to upload the required particulars and an opportunity of hearing before a fresh order was passed.
Working capital adjustment in a transfer pricing giving-effect order required proper evidentiary substantiation. The Court noted that the earlier direction to reconsider the claim was not enough because the petitioner failed to comply with the later requisition for working capital details and their impact on profit, and had only furnished an Excel calculation of the adjusted margin. Mere calculations were insufficient; the claim had to be authenticated with supporting documents duly certified by a Chartered Accountant. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh consideration on merits, with liberty to upload the required particulars and an opportunity of hearing before a fresh order was passed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
