Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Bogus long-term capital gains from penny stock transactions were rejected where contract notes, demat entries, bank records and sale documents did not establish genuineness. The Tribunal found that the scrip showed abnormal price movement unrelated to the company's financial position and business activity, the original purchase was through an off-market route in an unlisted company, and the assessee was not shown to be a regular or informed investor. Applying the human probabilities test, it treated the transaction as a pre-arranged accommodation entry mechanism to convert unaccounted income into exempt capital gains. The burden under section 68 was not discharged, the addition was upheld, and exemption under section 10(38) was denied.
Bogus long-term capital gains from penny stock transactions were rejected where contract notes, demat entries, bank records and sale documents did not establish genuineness. The Tribunal found that the scrip showed abnormal price movement unrelated to the company's financial position and business activity, the original purchase was through an off-market route in an unlisted company, and the assessee was not shown to be a regular or informed investor. Applying the human probabilities test, it treated the transaction as a pre-arranged accommodation entry mechanism to convert unaccounted income into exempt capital gains. The burden under section 68 was not discharged, the addition was upheld, and exemption under section 10(38) was denied.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
