Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
TDS credit is available only to the person in whose hands the related income is assessable. The assessee, an APMC commission agent, admitted that the purchases and sales on which tax was deducted were those of agriculturists or farmers, not his own sales income. On that factual basis, the ITAT held that TDS reflected in the assessee's PAN was a wrong deduction entry and could not be claimed by him without corresponding income being offered to tax. The proper remedy was correction of the TDS statement by the deductor or issue of the credit in the correct names. The denial of TDS credit was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.
TDS credit is available only to the person in whose hands the related income is assessable. The assessee, an APMC commission agent, admitted that the purchases and sales on which tax was deducted were those of agriculturists or farmers, not his own sales income. On that factual basis, the ITAT held that TDS reflected in the assessee's PAN was a wrong deduction entry and could not be claimed by him without corresponding income being offered to tax. The proper remedy was correction of the TDS statement by the deductor or issue of the credit in the correct names. The denial of TDS credit was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.