Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
TDS credit is available only to the person in whose hands the related income is assessable. The assessee, an APMC commission agent, admitted that the purchases and sales on which tax was deducted were those of agriculturists or farmers, not his own sales income. On that factual basis, the ITAT held that TDS reflected in the assessee's PAN was a wrong deduction entry and could not be claimed by him without corresponding income being offered to tax. The proper remedy was correction of the TDS statement by the deductor or issue of the credit in the correct names. The denial of TDS credit was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.
TDS credit is available only to the person in whose hands the related income is assessable. The assessee, an APMC commission agent, admitted that the purchases and sales on which tax was deducted were those of agriculturists or farmers, not his own sales income. On that factual basis, the ITAT held that TDS reflected in the assessee's PAN was a wrong deduction entry and could not be claimed by him without corresponding income being offered to tax. The proper remedy was correction of the TDS statement by the deductor or issue of the credit in the correct names. The denial of TDS credit was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.