Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1561 to 1580 of 96406 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Fair market rent for business premises cannot be enhanced merely on an Inspector's report or comparison with a different property in another city when no credible material shows that a similarly situated property in the same locality would fetch higher rent; the assessee's disclosed rent was accepted as reasonable and the addition for understated rental income was deleted. Salary paid to the assessee's son was treated as genuine business expenditure where the record showed regular engagement in the family business, work at both business locations, past payment history, growing turnover and profits, and taxability in the recipient's hands; the disallowance was set aside and deleted. The appeal was partly allowed, with remaining grounds treated as not pressed or consequential.
Fair market rent for business premises cannot be enhanced merely on an Inspector's report or comparison with a different property in another city when no credible material shows that a similarly situated property in the same locality would fetch higher rent; the assessee's disclosed rent was accepted as reasonable and the addition for understated rental income was deleted. Salary paid to the assessee's son was treated as genuine business expenditure where the record showed regular engagement in the family business, work at both business locations, past payment history, growing turnover and profits, and taxability in the recipient's hands; the disallowance was set aside and deleted. The appeal was partly allowed, with remaining grounds treated as not pressed or consequential.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.