NPCI-based bank account validation for IEC applications and modifications enables real-time validation; incorrect details block submission or trigger ...
Creation/Invocation of pledge of securities through depository system: standardized pledge forms, notice requirement and invocation notifications to p...
Calendar Spread margin benefit for Single Stock Derivatives suspended on expiry day for expiring contracts; exchanges must implement systems and rule ...
Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
A belated operational creditor claim in CIRP was rejected because the claimant did not supply the breakup and supporting material needed for verification, and the claim could not be matched with the corporate debtor's records. The NCLAT held that the claimant failed to rebut the Resolution Professional's reasons for rejection, including non-response to repeated requests and lack of proof for the asserted interest component. Because the resolution process had already advanced to the stage where the resolution plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors and filed before the Adjudicating Authority, the deficient claim could not be entertained. The rejection was upheld and the appeal dismissed.
A belated operational creditor claim in CIRP was rejected because the claimant did not supply the breakup and supporting material needed for verification, and the claim could not be matched with the corporate debtor's records. The NCLAT held that the claimant failed to rebut the Resolution Professional's reasons for rejection, including non-response to repeated requests and lack of proof for the asserted interest component. Because the resolution process had already advanced to the stage where the resolution plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors and filed before the Adjudicating Authority, the deficient claim could not be entertained. The rejection was upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
